flower-shilling

TRUMP

Smithys Bullion - FINE GOLD AND SILVER
More comedy gems from the Truly Incompetent :ROFLMAO:

Attorney General Pam Bondi revealed Tuesday morning that the Department of Justice is to meet with Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein’s ‘madam’ who has expressed a desire to talk about the so called ‘client list’.

Little mistake right at the end of that sentence. It should read " the so called NOT client list " because according to Pam Bondi, there is no " Client List ".

And then this -

“Therefore, at the direction of Attorney General Bondi, I have communicated with counsel for Ms. Maxwell to determine whether she would be willing to speak with prosecutors from the Department. I anticipate meeting with Ms. Maxwell in the coming days. Until now, no administration on behalf of the Department had inquired about her willingness to meet with the government. That changes now,” Blanche further urged. Maxwell, currently serving a 20 year prison sentence for sexually trafficking and abusing underage girls, is the only person who has been held accountable for Epstein’s crimes.

Ahh, so some Genius was struck by the brilliant idea " I know, lets talk to Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's #1 accomplice ". He'll get a Masters Degree on top of his PHD for that bright idea :ROFLMAO:
 
shinymetal said:
So first you say "you lost me" when I say I want to see executions.
Now you're saying drag them out of buildings and chop their heads off?
Click to expand...
U want to execute ur Political opponents, for nothing more than having a different Opinion to u.

I'm advocating for Citizen Justice against known fucking CRIMINALS !

Like Nancy Pelosi ( $174K/year ) that has turned her time in Congress into a Multi Million $ Empire ( she's worth 100's of $ Million's ). Pelosi has year after year posted significantly better Stock Market performance than the Best Traders on Wall Street. It's not a " Listed Crime " for Congress to Insider Trade. Just 1 Example.

But the Citizen Justice know it's a Fucking Crime. So yeah drag her out (n)
 
You are changing my words disingenuous.
"Having a different opinion."
It is becoming apparent to me, that you are not a serious person.
 
shinymetal said:
You are changing my words disingenuous.
"Having a different opinion."
It is becoming apparent to me, that you are not a serious person.
Click to expand...
I copied ur words, I didn't change them at all. I will post this to ur original posting so it absolutely clear what u said -

I wouldn't even consider arresting his political enemies and locking them in small rooms on 1 meal a day or executing them over the line, in fact, I think that absolutely has to happen.

U say directly that u don't consider executing his political enemies to be over the line. U said directly that " I think that absolutely has to happen " ( executions ) So u are advocating for the execution of Trumps Political enemies - ie, because they have a different Political opinion.
 
shinymetal said:
I couldn't really.
I could be critical of the way he has handled certain things, but like I said, I'm aware I don't have all the information Trump has, and I'm willing to accept that things aren't necessarily as they seem. So I wont be critical.
At this point I wont entertain that he's guilty of any of the bullshit attacks as an argument against him, at the start I would think maybe that's true, but after a decade of increasingly retarded attacks, I just wont do that anymore, There enough people are already doing that, as an all in plan truster, I will be out there defending him.

For me to turn on him at this point, he would have to do some seriously horrific shit.
I don't consider deportations even close to that/
I wouldn't even consider arresting his political enemies and locking them in small rooms on 1 meal a day or executing them over the line, in fact, I think that absolutely has to happen.
Click to expand...
I copied ur words, I didn't change them at all. I will post this to ur original posting so it absolutely clear what u said -

I wouldn't even consider arresting his political enemies and locking them in small rooms on 1 meal a day or executing them over the line, in fact, I think that absolutely has to happen.
U say directly that u don't consider executing his political enemies to be over the line. U said directly that " I think that absolutely has to happen " ( executions ) So u are advocating for the execution of Trumps Political enemies - ie, because they have a different Political opinion.
 
I never said for "having different opinions."

You are making up what I said to make it seem like I said something different.

I don't play like that.
 
shinymetal said:
I never said for "having different opinions."

You are making up what I said to make it seem like I said something different.

I don't play like that.
Click to expand...
:ROFLMAO: ur just trying to play " semantics " with exact wording.

Ur intention in ur statement ( wording ) is quite clear -

I wouldn't even consider arresting his political enemies and locking them in small rooms on 1 meal a day or executing them over the line, in fact, I think that absolutely has to happen.

political enemies - meaning those with a different political opinion !

😞
 
> Plays semantics by twisting someone's words.
> Accuses that person of playing semantics when it's pointed out.

I mean come on.

> Says "you lost me" at execution.
> Advocates extra judicial killing.

Only an unserious person would act this way.
 
Unfortunately psychopathic genocidal dimwits coopted by pedophile networks are always the ones that kill everyone else , because they are trained from birth to regard others as expendable animals and servants. They never age well but they always find new bodies to inhabit.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top